Repetition Codes
Schätzung für'n Ressourcenaufwand: wenija als 'ne Minute uff'm Heron-Prozessa (ACHTUNG: Det is nur 'ne Schätzung. Deine tatsächliche Laufzeit kann abweicha.)
Hintergrund
Um echtzeitliche Quantenfehlerkorrektion (QEC) hinzukriegn, musste den Programmfluss während da Ausführung dynamisch steuern können, damit Quantengates von Messergebnissen abhängig jemacht wern können. Dit Tutorial führt den Bit-Flip-Code aus — 'ne sehr einfache Form von QEC. Et demonstriert 'nen dynamischn Quantenschaltkreis, der'n kodierten Qubit vor 'nem einzelnen Bit-Flip-Fehla schützn kann, un bewertet dann die Leistung vom Bit-Flip-Code.
Du kannst zusätzliche Ancilla-Qubits un Verschränkung nutzn, um Stabilisatorn zu messn, die die kodierte Quanteninformation nicht verändern, die dir aba trotzdem über bestimmte Fehlerklaasn Auskunft jebn, die eventuell aufjetreten sind. 'n Quanten-Stabilisator-Code kodiert logische Qubits in physikalische Qubits. Stabilisator-Codes konzentriern sich entscheidend uff dit Korrektion von 'nem diskreten Fehlerset, unterstützt von da Pauli-Gruppe .
Mehr Infos zu QEC findste bei Quantum Error Correction for Beginners.
Voraussetzungen
Bevor de mit dittm Tutorial anfängst, stell sicher, datte folgendes installiert hast:
- Qiskit SDK v2.0 oda neeja, mit Unterstützung für Visualisierung
- Qiskit Runtime v0.40 oda neeja (
pip install qiskit-ibm-runtime)
Einrichtung
# Qiskit imports
from qiskit import (
QuantumCircuit,
QuantumRegister,
ClassicalRegister,
)
# Qiskit Runtime
from qiskit_ibm_runtime import QiskitRuntimeService, SamplerV2 as Sampler
from qiskit_ibm_runtime.circuit import MidCircuitMeasure
service = QiskitRuntimeService()
Schritt 1. Klassische Eingaben uff'n Quantenproblem abbildn
Bit-Flip-Stabilisator-Schaltkreis bauhn
Da Bit-Flip-Code jehört zu den einfachsten Beispieln für 'nen Stabilisator-Code. Er schützt den Zustand vor 'nem einzelnen Bit-Flip-(X-)Fehla uff einem da Kodierungs-Qubits. Wenn ma den Bit-Flip-Fehler betrachtet — der un mappt — dann jibt et für jeden unsern Qubits: . Da Code braucht fünf Qubits: drei zum Kodieren vom jeschützten Zustand, un die restlichn zwei als Stabilisatormess-Ancillas.
# Choose the least busy backend that supports `measure_2`.
backend = service.least_busy(
filters=lambda b: "measure_2" in b.supported_instructions,
operational=True,
simulator=False,
dynamic_circuits=True,
)
qreg_data = QuantumRegister(3)
qreg_measure = QuantumRegister(2)
creg_data = ClassicalRegister(3, name="data")
creg_syndrome = ClassicalRegister(2, name="syndrome")
state_data = qreg_data[0]
ancillas_data = qreg_data[1:]
def build_qc():
"""Build a typical error correction circuit"""
return QuantumCircuit(qreg_data, qreg_measure, creg_data, creg_syndrome)
def initialize_qubits(circuit: QuantumCircuit):
"""Initialize qubit to |1>"""
circuit.x(qreg_data[0])
circuit.barrier(qreg_data)
return circuit
def encode_bit_flip(circuit, state, ancillas) -> QuantumCircuit:
"""Encode bit-flip. This is done by simply adding a cx"""
for ancilla in ancillas:
circuit.cx(state, ancilla)
circuit.barrier(state, *ancillas)
return circuit
def measure_syndrome_bit(circuit, qreg_data, qreg_measure, creg_measure):
"""
Measure the syndrome by measuring the parity.
We reset our ancilla qubits after measuring the stabilizer
so we can reuse them for repeated stabilizer measurements.
Because we have already observed the state of the qubit,
we can write the conditional reset protocol directly to
avoid another round of qubit measurement if we used
the `reset` instruction.
"""
circuit.cx(qreg_data[0], qreg_measure[0])
circuit.cx(qreg_data[1], qreg_measure[0])
circuit.cx(qreg_data[0], qreg_measure[1])
circuit.cx(qreg_data[2], qreg_measure[1])
circuit.barrier(*qreg_data, *qreg_measure)
circuit.append(MidCircuitMeasure(), [qreg_measure[0]], [creg_measure[0]])
circuit.append(MidCircuitMeasure(), [qreg_measure[1]], [creg_measure[1]])
with circuit.if_test((creg_measure[0], 1)):
circuit.x(qreg_measure[0])
with circuit.if_test((creg_measure[1], 1)):
circuit.x(qreg_measure[1])
circuit.barrier(*qreg_data, *qreg_measure)
return circuit
def apply_correction_bit(circuit, qreg_data, creg_syndrome):
"""We can detect where an error occurred and correct our state"""
with circuit.if_test((creg_syndrome, 3)):
circuit.x(qreg_data[0])
with circuit.if_test((creg_syndrome, 1)):
circuit.x(qreg_data[1])
with circuit.if_test((creg_syndrome, 2)):
circuit.x(qreg_data[2])
circuit.barrier(qreg_data)
return circuit
def apply_final_readout(circuit, qreg_data, creg_data):
"""Read out the final measurements"""
circuit.barrier(qreg_data)
circuit.measure(qreg_data, creg_data)
return circuit
def build_error_correction_sequence(apply_correction: bool) -> QuantumCircuit:
circuit = build_qc()
circuit = initialize_qubits(circuit)
circuit = encode_bit_flip(circuit, state_data, ancillas_data)
circuit = measure_syndrome_bit(
circuit, qreg_data, qreg_measure, creg_syndrome
)
if apply_correction:
circuit = apply_correction_bit(circuit, qreg_data, creg_syndrome)
circuit = apply_final_readout(circuit, qreg_data, creg_data)
return circuit
circuit = build_error_correction_sequence(apply_correction=True)
circuit.draw(output="mpl", style="iqp", cregbundle=False)
Schritt 2. Det Problem für die Quantenausführung optimiern
Um die Jesamtausführungszeit vom Job zu vakürzen, akzeptiern Qiskit-Primitives nur Schaltkreise un Observablen, die zu den Anweisungen un da Konnektivität vom Zielsystem passn (bezeichnet als ISA-Schaltkreise un -Observablen). Mehr über Transpilation erfahn.
ISA-Schaltkreise erzeugen
from qiskit.transpiler.preset_passmanagers import generate_preset_pass_manager
pm = generate_preset_pass_manager(backend=backend, optimization_level=1)
isa_circuit = pm.run(circuit)
isa_circuit.draw("mpl", style="iqp", idle_wires=False)


no_correction_circuit = build_error_correction_sequence(
apply_correction=False
)
isa_no_correction_circuit = pm.run(no_correction_circuit)
Schritt 3. Mit Qiskit-Primitives ausführn
Führ die Version mit Korrektion un eine ohne Korrektion aus.
sampler_no_correction = Sampler(backend)
job_no_correction = sampler_no_correction.run(
[isa_no_correction_circuit], shots=1000
)
result_no_correction = job_no_correction.result()[0]
sampler_with_correction = Sampler(backend)
job_with_correction = sampler_with_correction.run([isa_circuit], shots=1000)
result_with_correction = job_with_correction.result()[0]
print(f"Data (no correction):\n{result_no_correction.data.data.get_counts()}")
print(
f"Syndrome (no correction):\n{result_no_correction.data.syndrome.get_counts()}"
)
Data (no correction):
{'111': 878, '011': 42, '110': 35, '101': 40, '100': 1, '001': 2, '000': 2}
Syndrome (no correction):
{'00': 942, '10': 33, '01': 22, '11': 3}
print(f"Data (corrected):\n{result_with_correction.data.data.get_counts()}")
print(
f"Syndrome (corrected):\n{result_with_correction.data.syndrome.get_counts()}"
)
Data (corrected):
{'111': 889, '110': 25, '000': 11, '011': 45, '101': 17, '010': 10, '001': 2, '100': 1}
Syndrome (corrected):
{'00': 929, '01': 39, '10': 20, '11': 12}
Schritt 4. Nachbearbeitung — Ergebnis im klassischn Format zurückjebn
Du kannst sehn, dass da Bit-Flip-Code viele Fehla erkannt un korrigiert hat, wodurch insjesamt wenija Fehla übrig bleibn.
def decode_result(data_counts, syndrome_counts):
shots = sum(data_counts.values())
success_trials = data_counts.get("000", 0) + data_counts.get("111", 0)
failed_trials = shots - success_trials
error_correction_events = shots - syndrome_counts.get("00", 0)
print(
f"Bit flip errors were detected/corrected on {error_correction_events}/{shots} trials."
)
print(
f"A final parity error was detected on {failed_trials}/{shots} trials."
)
# non-corrected marginalized results
data_result = result_no_correction.data.data.get_counts()
marginalized_syndrome_result = result_no_correction.data.syndrome.get_counts()
print(
f"Completed bit code experiment data measurement counts (no correction): {data_result}"
)
print(
f"Completed bit code experiment syndrome measurement counts (no correction): {marginalized_syndrome_result}"
)
decode_result(data_result, marginalized_syndrome_result)
Completed bit code experiment data measurement counts (no correction): {'111': 878, '011': 42, '110': 35, '101': 40, '100': 1, '001': 2, '000': 2}
Completed bit code experiment syndrome measurement counts (no correction): {'00': 942, '10': 33, '01': 22, '11': 3}
Bit flip errors were detected/corrected on 58/1000 trials.
A final parity error was detected on 120/1000 trials.
# corrected marginalized results
corrected_data_result = result_with_correction.data.data.get_counts()
corrected_syndrome_result = result_with_correction.data.syndrome.get_counts()
print(
f"Completed bit code experiment data measurement counts (corrected): {corrected_data_result}"
)
print(
f"Completed bit code experiment syndrome measurement counts (corrected): {corrected_syndrome_result}"
)
decode_result(corrected_data_result, corrected_syndrome_result)
Completed bit code experiment data measurement counts (corrected): {'111': 889, '110': 25, '000': 11, '011': 45, '101': 17, '010': 10, '001': 2, '100': 1}
Completed bit code experiment syndrome measurement counts (corrected): {'00': 929, '01': 39, '10': 20, '11': 12}
Bit flip errors were detected/corrected on 71/1000 trials.
A final parity error was detected on 100/1000 trials.
Umfrage zum Tutorial
Mach bitte diese kurze Umfrage un jib uns Rückmeldung zu dittm Tutorial. Deine Anmerkungen helfn uns, unsre Inhalte un Benutzererfahrung zu vabessern.